Trump tariffs return until June 9 after appeals court stays injunction

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited May 29

A U.S. trade court ruled that President Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs were illegal on Wednesday, but the administration has been granted a temporary stay until arguments are filed.

Smartphone displaying time resting on a notebook with a pen on top, next to a laptop keyboard.
Tariffs could affect iPhone prices in the fall



The Trump administration implemented wide-ranging and incredibly high tariffs throughout its initial weeks of being in power. After a lot of back and forth, exemptions, threats of new tariffs, and a lot of uncertainty, the madness seemed to be ending thanks to a U.S. trade court ruling.

That respite was short-lived, however, as CNBC reports that an appeals court has stayed the permanent injunction until June 9. That's the deadline for both parties to file arguments about the case, and the courts will then decide if a longer stay is in order during appeal.

Both the "Liberation Day" tariffs and the previous trafficking tariffs levied against Mexico and Canada were deemed illegal by the court. It argues that the Emergency Economic Powers Act doesn't actually grant the President power to control trade -- a power defined in the Constitution as belonging to Congress.

The appeal and request for a stay kept the markets from reacting too quickly to the injunction Thursday morning. It is unclear exactly what the Trump administration may do in the interim.

Apple is caught in the middle of this mess, as it is a company heavily invested in the global supply chain. No matter how much it maneuvers, it will be hit in some way by the historically high tariffs.

It shared that it would take a $900 million hit to its bottom line in the June quarter alone if nothing changed. The iPhone 17 could also see global price raises to compensate for any tariffs that are in place.

Currently, there are still threats of two different additional tariffs from the Trump administration that could affect Apple. One is a tariff on all products imported with semiconductors, and another is a tariff on all smartphones manufactured outside of the United States.

Since those two tariffs are likely going to be levied as a result of a legal investigation, and not the EEPA, they could go into effect regardless of the trade court's rulings. It's going to be a complicated summer for Apple, but luckily WWDC should remain unaffected unless the administration finds a way to charge companies for software updates.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 6
    williamlondonwilliamlondon Posts: 1,511member
    Calmer legal experts are stating this is a temporary not permanent stay while they decide next steps, "an actual administrative stay" meaning not a judgment and not a precursor to overturning it. Sucks, but this is our wheel of justice in motion.
    gavza
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 6
    quakerotisquakerotis Posts: 160member
    If you plant ice
    You're gonna harvest wind
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 6
    dewmedewme Posts: 6,059member
    There’s the notion of a dumpster fire inside a dumpster fire, i i.e., dumpster fire squared. I think we’re at dumpster fire to the fifth power now, to be optimistic. It might even be worse. 
    muthuk_vanalingam
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 6
    TACO Supreme :D
    dewme
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 6
    anthogaganthogag Posts: 38member
    Trump uses tariffs like a dictator who believes he is above any law. He eats law for breakfast and the clowns around him wipe his chin and kiss his butt. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 6
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,748member
    Tariffs are a TAX on the consumers in the country that issues the tariffs. They do little harm to large companies that make the goods the tarriff-issuing country needs.

    But they hurt the HELL out of small businesses both in the issuing country and the exporting country.

    Tariffs are a constitutionally enumerated power of CONGRESS (Article 1, Section 8), though Congress ceded to the executive branch the power to negotiate trade agreements in 1934. Some additional tariff authority was ceded to the executive in laws passed in 1962 and 1974, which was a mistake in my view.

    Congress should claw back those two latter changes via new legislation. Yes, the current Congress is lopsidedly partisan in line (mostly) with the current president, but that's part and parcel of the US' imperfect system, and voters at least have a chance to address partisan imbalances every two years.

    So I encourage any US residents reading this to be sure you are registered to vote. I also encourage voters who tend to prefer one party over another to bee willing to cross your usual party lines in order to stock Congress with representatives that have a plan to undo the tariffs in favour of other, better measures that might better address the concerns the president has raised.
    edited May 31
    beowulfschmidt
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.